Op-Ed Commentaries
January 12, 2009
Stan and Sue Jennings
Tamarack must be funded
Advertisement - Your ad here

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- We can't understand why our governor and other members of state government are so quick to dismiss the one really good thing this state has going for it. Tamarack has been a shining success story from the first day it opened its door 12 years ago.

Finally, we are being recognized as something other than illiterate hillbillies, coal miners and timber operators. We have taken a lead in the nation as a state who recognizes, fosters and supports its cottage industries and emerging artists. We capture millions of dollars from out-of-state visitors that are dispersed among Tamarack's vendors to every county in the state. This type of income helps us to keep one of the last and most valuable resources we have that hasn't been taken from us, our human resources, right here in West Virginia, instead of losing people to other parts of the country in their attempt to make a living.

Subsidy money for Tamarack was never an issue when operated by the Parkways Authority. What money was allocated from sales of food and gas on the Turnpike didn't amount to enough to start or even think about completing any road paving or maintenance project.

Now that Gov. Manchin has deemed it necessary to transfer Tamarack to the State Commerce Department, subsidy money will be much harder to find when thrown into the budget with everything else. I would hope they understand the importance of supporting this outstanding monument of achievement that has been accomplished right here on our own soil. We have one of the most visited arts complexes in the nation, a destination point to many travelers, a cultural experience hard to match anywhere in this country.

My husband and I have traveled across this nation several times by vehicle. We inquire at every state's welcome center as to any place they could recommend for regional art and culture. We haven't found anything even close, not at all like what we have right here in Beckley. How can we risk losing this shining ambassador for our state?

We have been self-supporting full-time artists for 20 years. The last 12 have been our best years, thanks in big part to business Tamarack has brought us. We employ 10 people in our workshop, with an annual payroll around $250,000. We live in a rural part of Preston County 30 miles away from any job paying comparable wages. Our 10 employees get to work and stay close to home, allowing for higher living standards for all of them. We take one of our state's abundant natural resources, wood, turn it into beautiful pieces of functional kitchenware, and then sell these items to people, shops and galleries all across the United States. All money made from this stays in West Virginia. Tamarack is responsible for an immeasurable amount of this success. Countless people and shops have located us through Tamarack, aside from the people who buy merchandise directly there every year.

Common sense dictates: If it's not broke, don't fix it. Gov. Manchin, the Legislature and the people of West Virginia should really take note and listen to their small-business leaders. Allow us to live and work in West Virginia. Don't take from us one of our most affluent venues. Allow our heritage arts and culture their rightful place in the commerce of our state. Keep Tamarack as it is, so we can share it with the rest of the world.

Stan and Sue Jennings are proprietors of Allegheny Treenware in Thornton. Their Web site is spooners.com.

Advertisement - Your ad here
Report a violation or offensive comment.
[X] Close
to report abuse.
Posted By: smarbap (10:54pm 01-14-2009)
Report Abuse


If there is truly a market for that which Tamarack offers, let the private sector provide the venue for it. While it is indeed a nice facility, most Turnpike travelers see it merely as an ornate rest area.

Posted By: mtnmedic (3:51pm 01-13-2009)
Report Abuse


Tamarack has never made a profit. Congradulations to Mr. Jennings on his success. Now that you have made a profit from the efforts of taxpayers funding your venue to market your products, we can all expect revenue sharing checks in the near future, right? In all seriousness, I like Tamarack, but I think the cost of building it and subsidizing it is more than it's worth. Maybe if the artisans were allowed to operate it--meaning being financially resposible for it's success or failure, they might see it as costing beyond it's worth as well. If we as taxpayers eat the cost fo it's building and property and leave it to the artisans to operate how long will the lights stay on? Without government subsidy? I say give 'em a chance. If it fails, NO BAIL OUT! Let's see if it can pay for itself.

Posted By: jadel (2:20pm 01-13-2009)
Report Abuse


I've been to Tamarack a number of times. As far as I am concerned, the only worthwhile thing about it is the food. The building itself is hideous, a kind of nighmare version of a 1950's hypermodern drive-in restaurant on steroids. The art and crafts for sale are mainly overpriced yuppie bait. If the place is as valuable and productive as the Jennings claim,here is no reason taxpayers should subsidize its operation.

Posted By: pacaderm (12:25am 01-13-2009)
Report Abuse


Tamarack loses appx 1 million dollars per year. Does this reming any of us older West Virginian's of the state liquor store business that the Demoocrats just could not sell off? Our politicians should cut taxes by cutting spending. Enact serious tort reform and attempt to cut the welfare roles in half. Not spend their times losing 1 mil per year

It's easy to follow the top stories with home delivery of The Charleston Gazette.

Click here to order home delivery.

Advertisement - Your ad here