Nationally-Recognized, Quality Local Journalism..

Click here to stay informed and subscribe to the Mountain State’s Trusted News Source.

Click #isupportlocal for more information on supporting our local journalists.

Learn more about HD Media

In response to former justice Evan Jenkins’ recent resignation from the state Supreme Court, members the House of Delegates are moving quickly to strip West Virginians of their ability to have a say in who will fill the seat left vacant by Jenkins’ departure.

Under existing law, Jenkins’ replacement would be required to stand for election in November. When a vacancy occurs on the Supreme Court, the governor fills the seat by appointment. If there are more than two years remaining in the term, the governor’s appointee must run in a special election before completing the rest of that same term. This would be the case for Jenkins’ seat, because his term doesn’t expire until 2024.

However, a bill advanced by the House Judiciary Committee would raise the threshold to three years, taking power away from West Virginia voters and shielding partisan or incompetent judges from any kind of public check for several years.

Proponents of House Bill 4785, which is expected to receive a full House vote Wednesday, have defended it on the grounds that it preserves continuity and promotes trust in the court. That couldn’t be more wrong. Like any other powerful elected position, continuity and trust for our judges must be earned. West Virginians did not ask for their electoral power to be weakened, and doing so now by jamming a bill through the Legislature at the last minute can only erode public confidence in our state’s highest court.

The justification that HB 4785 is needed “to maintain stability in our judiciary” smacks of hypocrisy, considering that the Republican-controlled House voted to impeach the entire Supreme Court in 2018, taking advantage of a spending scandal to tip the balance of the court by pushing multiple justices off the bench and making way for Gov. Jim Justice to fill the vacant seats with partisan allies.

Stories you might like

Evan Jenkins’ decision to become a lobbyist or attorney for special interests that want to deny justice to injured workers and their families, less than two weeks after stepping down from the court, is far more damaging to the reputation and credibility of the judiciary than any acts of maladministration, incompetence or misuse of state resources alleged in the articles of impeachment against current and former justices. Justice Beth Walker was essentially impeached for failing to keep her male colleagues from misbehaving.

Maintaining continuity and ensuring trust in the judiciary starts by making decisions about judicial appointments based on merit and filling vacancies with people who actually want to serve as judges, instead of political opportunists and corporate shills. It also requires having a process that’s transparent and ensures public input and accountability.

We have a process in place for filling judicial vacancies, and that process involves West Virginia voters. HB 4785 would eliminate their role and an important check on the governor’s appointment power.

The stakes for regular West Virginians are far too high to risk this kind of judicial power grab. Our Supreme Court frequently has the final say on critical issues, like education funding, access to health care, worker protection, neighborhood safety and the quality of our air and water. The people of West Virginia deserve to have a say-so on their courts. Members of the House must reject this bill.

Julie Archer is project manager at West Virginia Citizen Action Group and coordinator of West Virginia Citizens for Clean Elections.

Recommended for you